Category Archives: crisis management

100 Years of High Kicks & Toy Soldiers: The Staying Power of The Radio City Rockettes  

Posted on by
Reply

The Radio City Rockettes are celebrating their 100th birthday this year, with their annual Christmas Spectacular show well underway in New York City. What began as a humble dance troupe in Missouri known as the Rockets, The Rockettes have grown into an American holiday staple that continues to withstand the test of time. But what is it about the Radio City dance troupe’s 100-year brand that draws the attention of millions of people per year?  

From the eye-high kicks to iconic formations, The Rockettes are the pinnacle of holiday nostalgia. Every year, over a million people attend their Christmas Spectacular.  Millions more watch them on the Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade. But a brand that has been around for 100 years doesn’t go unscathed by time’s heavy hand. The Rockette’s are certainly no exception. We’ve noted just a few times of the many times below where the storied dancing team neared extinction:  

  • 1967: Just before the holiday season in 1967, the Radio City Rockettes went on strike, demanding a 40% increase in wages and payment for rehearsals. For nearly a month, the dancers picketed outside Radio City until representatives of the music hall gave in, agreeing to a pay increase from $99 to $126.50 per week.  
  • 1978: In 1978, it was announced that Radio City Music Hall would close with talk of a complete demolition after it was revealed that the venue had been operating at a loss of approximately $2 million. With just days to make a plan and rally supporters together, Dance Captain Rosemary Novellino and Captain of the Singers Bill Mearns alongside fellow performers and theater staff collected signatures to make Radio City Music Hall a National Historic Landmark. The theater was officially saved in March of 1978.   
  • 2020: Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020, Radio City was forced to cancel their entire Christmas Spectacular and part of the 2021 season. With the Christmas Spectacular grossing roughly $90 million alone, this hit hard for the dance company. Fortunately, The Rockettes were able to salvage part of their 2021 season and come back strong in 2022.  

Additionally, The Rockettes have not been without criticism. The troupe was borne with height requirements that welcomed only dancers between 5-foot-2 and 5-foot-6.5. Since then, height requirements have been expanded, and the dance group has welcomed more diversity. The group brought on their first non-white dancer in 1985, but according to USA Today Network New York, the 2022 Christmas Spectacular had just 13% representation of Black, Latino and Asian-American Pacific Islanders, which make up 36% of America’s population, so there is still a way to go. Keeping the brand relevant, The Rockettes have taken steps to respond to this criticism by hosting workshops at historically black colleges and universities, by partnering with dance troupes in underrepresented areas, and by working to reduce financial hardships for those aspiring dancers attending their summer programs.  

History has shown labor disputes, impending demolitions, a worldwide pandemic and cancel culture as more than enough to shut down any brand, especially in the performing arts industry.  

Still, The Rockettes maintain their status as an American institution. They prove there is immense staying power in tradition and nostalgia, while at the same time taking some steps to adapt to modern times. For millions of people around the world every year, a trip to see the Rockettes marks the beginning of a magical holiday season. Each year, the show is reimagined with a few consistent numbers to tug on the audience’s sentimental heart strings like the iconic wooden soldiers and the troupe’s signature kick lines. Audiences appreciate the familiarity, especially when the world around them can feel uncertain.  

While The Rockettes have maintained their traditional roots, they have also innovated throughout the years to reach and engage wider audiences. These small, creative refinements that The Rockettes have made to their set design, lighting, choreography and more throughout the years honor their roots, while still giving audiences something unexpected. In an effort to modernize and claim the hearts of those outside New York City, The Rockettes also expanded into television, film and event appearances, even cementing an annual spot on the Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade since 1957. This widespread reach reinforces the prestigious role of being a Rockette and maintains recognition beyond Radio City Music Hall.  

A brand 100 years in the making, The Rockettes remain a timeless constant in American culture from the depression era to the COVID-19 pandemic and every event in between. Happy 100th Birthday to the iconic Radio City Rockettes, and cheers to 100 more years of holiday magic.   

Speaking with Authenticity: Lessons from the ‘Phillies Karen’ Viral Drama

Posted on by
Reply

The rules of crisis communication have changed drastically over the last decade. Crisis communication and reputation management have quickly become must-haves due to the nature of digital devices. Incidents that would once blow over in a day or even hours can snowball, fueling endless media coverage and content. Today, a story can be instantly amplified on social media; however, it can also stoke up misinformation, creating a crisis or viral drama of its own.

As caught on camera during a recent Philadelphia Phillies game, a fan demanded that a father give her a home run ball, causing a stir on social media. The father took the ball back from his young son and handed it to the woman, who proceeded back to her seat, ball in hand. The incident stirred a public manhunt to find the ‘Phillies Karen’ in question. Multiple misidentifications ensued. Interestingly, a recent study from Science reported that misinformation travels “farther, faster, deeper and more broadly than the truth.”

A comprehensive, thoughtful and tested crisis communication plan, as well as a commitment to speak with authenticity to set the record straight, are two key elements to navigate any crisis or national outrage. Here are lessons from the ‘Phillies Karen’ incident worth noting.

Get the Facts Straight to Avoid Premature Conclusions

In the case of the viral Phillies incident, social media rumors led to the false identification of a school administrator and later, a Red Sox fan, causing viral online condemnations. Both the school and the individual quickly took to social media to set the record straight, each releasing timely, clever and light-hearted, prepared statements and responses.

“The woman identified on social media as ‘Phillies Karen’ is not and has never been, an employee of the Hammonton Public Schools … Anyone who works for our school district, attended as a student or lives in our community would obviously have caught the ball bare-handed in the first place, avoiding this entire situation.”

“I’m not the crazy Philly Mom (but I sure would love to be as thin as she is and move as fast)… and I’m a Red Sox fan.”.

The falsely accused school and individual swiftly jumped in to provide clear, concise and witty posts to mitigate risk. The statements and responses provided detailed feedback on their lack of involvement.

Effective crisis communication and reputation management hinge on getting the facts straight. Viewers count on their favorite news sources and social media platforms for the latest headlines, and from there, often make quick assumptions.

During times of crisis, it’s important to align internally on key messaging before releasing any information on behalf of a brand or individual. Once an incident is on the radar, be ready to monitor for media coverage and social media mentions, and stay alert for inbound media requests as they arise.

Have a Plan and Respond Authentically

Crisis communication plans and strategies are essential for managing crisis incidents and allow brands and individuals to get ahead of potentially business damaging premature conclusions.

Incident management requires a strategic yet thoughtful approach. In addition to respecting the gravity of each situation, brands and individuals must look to protect their reputations and share the facts while staying true to their brand voice and values.

Responding with authenticity can defuse a crisis. When a predicament hits, brands and individuals can be adversely affected, even if they’re not at fault. False accusations and other misinformation can quickly diminish trust in a company or personal reputation, causing inconvenience, damage or disruptions if not corrected.

A prompt crisis communication response that is truthful and genuine without bias can be crucial for managing false news and other propaganda, as well as mitigating risk. Brands and individuals must look to set the right tone based on the incident, while also ensuring that their brand messaging and positioning are reflected.

In the case of the Phillies Karen, both parties showed integrity and accountability while also staying true to their brand voice. Their respective statements were factual, with a bit of humor sprinkled in to match the severity of the situation.

So, while memes come and go and headlines fade away, damage to a brand or personal reputation can stick around. Don’t get caught up in the internet’s next big drama—brands and individuals must have a crisis communication plan and strategy ready to mitigate potential crisis or national outrage.

Navigating Verbal Missteps: Warnings from the Reality Show “Big Brother”

Posted on by
Reply

George Orwell’s novel “1984” first introduced the concept of “Big Brother,” a totalitarian surveillance state watching your every move, to the lexicon in 1949. And in 2000, CBS launched its own spin on the concept with the reality show “Big Brother.” Equal parts social experiment and competitive event, “Big Brother” follows a select number of contestants, referred to as houseguests, as they compete to win $750,000 while living together in a house isolated from the outside world.  

Many reality shows may tout an up-close-and-personal glimpse at their stars, but little offer as much access to participants in real time as Big Brother. Since the show’s premiere, CBS has provided viewers with a 24/7 live feed of the contestants living in the house. At any point in the day, save for certain competitions or ceremonies restricted for the episodes, someone can hop on Paramount Plus to watch houseguests hang out, strategize and often, say the wrong thing.  

Though houseguests are made aware they are being filmed continuously via live feed, several houseguests have been recorded on camera making racist, homophobic or sexist comments. Consequently, some have been forced to leave the show and navigate long-lasting consequences.   

Houseguest Rylie Jeffries landed in hot water online for his treatment of fellow contestant and “showmance”, Katherine Woodman, in the season currently airing. When host Julie Chen asked him about some of the declarations he’d made in the house after he was voted out, his response was, “I can’t believe y’all heard that.”  

Just like other Big Brother houseguests of seasons past, anyone can turn into a headline overnight. It’s a story becoming increasingly common – an executive or employee makes an insensitive comment and puts themselves and their company in the hotseat. You may think it can’t happen to you, but who knows? Here are a few lessons to take from Big Brother contestant missteps:  

  1. Always assume someone is listening: Big Brother houseguests are required to wear microphones at all times. Every conversation, no matter how benign, is recorded for the audience to hear. While this kind of 24/7 surveillance once seemed unbelievable, social media has opened the floodgates and provided individuals with a platform to expose public slip ups. Social media is riddled with countless comments calling for the employment or other personal details of individuals caught in hot-mic moments or who may have said something controversial publicly. 
  1. Understand how you want to be perceived: Contestants are frequently shown saying one thing in diary confessionals, only to be shown saying and doing something completely the opposite in the house. This sort of flip-flopping may be understandable in the context of a game, but it won’t always fly in the real world. People want to connect with brands and companies that align with their values and when individuals representing the company’s stated mission fail to reflect them, it can breed frustration.  
  1. Utilize your communications team: Big Brother contestants spend their time in the house with no contact or input from the outside world. No one is there to guide messaging or consider public perception. Companies don’t have to be at the same disadvantage. The right communications team will anticipate crisis situations before they happen, working with leadership and serving as a resource for the wider team.  

100-plus cameras may not be following your every move, but the court of public opinion is. It no longer takes signing up for a reality show to launch your public misstep to virality. We can learn from these houseguests’ mistakes and use it for smart and effective communications that strengthen relationships with audiences.  

The Velvet Rope is Gone. Today’s Executives Must Be Aware of the Public Eye and Act Accordingly

Posted on by
Reply

Executives behaving badly, particularly CEOs, is nothing new. But in an era where anyone with a phone is de facto paparazzi, every Instagram story becomes Exhibit A in the court of public opinion. It’s become clear C-suites can no longer operate exclusively behind closed doors. Corporate leaders, once protected by layers of privacy, PR and legal gatekeeping, are now finding themselves subject to a bright, unrelenting, and at times, unforgiving spotlight.

The expectations for executive conduct haven’t necessarily changed, but the surrounding environment and the stakes certainly have. When an executive, particularly the CEO, says one thing and does the opposite, it erodes trust quickly. For example, a CEO demanding that employees endure daily office commutes, only to work remotely from St. Barts, sends a very clear message to employees and the public that they see themselves as an exception to the rule.

Additionally, we’ve entered into an era of “optics-driven accountability.” Perceptions will shape the narrative faster than the facts will surface – and boards need to recognize that as well as the value a good comms team can bring to play in these situations. Just a screenshot, a caption and a handful of internet sleuths with time on their hands have the power to shape a narrative.

Of course, this brings to mind the recent viral incident of Astronomer CEO Andy Byron caught on the jumbotron at a Coldplay concert in Boston, embracing the company’s head of HR, Kristin Cabot. The moment raged across social media, quickly raising questions about an alleged affair. It also continues to generate endless mimicry and judgment of a CEO engaging in such a public display with an employee. The company’s board quickly launched an investigation, and Byron resigned shortly after the incident. No crime was committed, but all the same, the company was thrust into uncomfortable optics of blurred boundaries that CEOs regularly cross and a storyline that quickly outpaced the PR team’s ability to contain it.

This is far from the only case. California Governor Gavin Newsom famously dined, indoors, at French Laundry, amid one of the strictest COVID lockdowns in the country. The public became outraged by the perceived hypocrisy of being stuck at home, FaceTiming friends and family and ordering DoorDash while a public figure sidestepped the very rules he imposed. Again, countless headlines, social media posts and memes followed.

On a slightly smaller scale, a CEO of a Florida-based insurance company made headlines this July after his wife’s social media posts highlighted their extravagant lifestyle – luxury cars, private planes and yachts, designer bags, clothes and jewelry. While there was seemingly no misconduct, the posts ignited a social media firestorm and drew widespread media attention. The backlash quickly escalated, with consumer advocates and even elected officials weighing in. Many Florida homeowners, already grappling with rocketing premiums and shrinking coverage options, found the display as emblematic of a deeper disconnect between wealthy executives and the public.

These incidents, and others like them, highlight a new reality: C-suites are as visible outside the office as they are inside. They are now part of the story whether they intend to be or not. Choices matter – behavior in and outside the “office” – can signal values, and intent. And in a world full of corporate messaging, actions often speak louder than an entire comms team.

So, what is company leadership to do?

Encourage executives to practice conscious transparency. This doesn’t mean living ascetically; it just means living in alignment with the company and personal values. For example, if the company just laid off staff, don’t post a video calling it a “difficult decision” from the luxury penthouse. If customers and employees are making sacrifices, don’t show off excessively. If the brand stands for integrity, make sure executive conduct reinforces it.

Lean into the expertise of your comms team. Reputational equity is as valuable as financial equity. Consumers latch onto brands, and leaders, that align with their values. Executives should work with their comms teams to make sure the optics they present as an individual are in line with the company’s mission. Experienced communications teams can help identify risks early and direct leaders away from avoidable reputational mistakes. Quiet counsel, ones that operate behind the scenes, can prevent public missteps that can put executives – and the company – in the media hot seat.

The velvet rope is gone. Individuals with cameras, notepads and press credentials are no longer the only means for a story taking hold. The court of public opinion is in control and armed with its own tools to take a story viral.

The Secret to Great Public Relations: Client Candor

Posted on by
Reply

This July marks the start of Kimball Hughes Public Relations’ 30th year in business. Reflecting on the agency’s history along with my own 22-year run as a PR professional, I’ve thought a lot about some of the most valuable PR lessons, for agencies and organizations that hire them. The one I keep coming back to is this: stop selling. And I’m talking to the clients. 

Of course, agencies of all kinds, at least in the beginning, need to sell clients on hiring them. Meanwhile an interesting, frequent and largely unspoken parallel exists where clients—for- and non-profits alike—continue to sell themselves to their agencies well after contracts are signed.  

What I mean is this: As the agency employees meet with subject matter experts or hold meetings with leadership, the organization will present its products, services, market position and even its executives as the best, most innovative, most insightful people and products within their space. While some of that may be (hopefully) true, there’s a bit of salesmanship involved. Put another way, if you aren’t telling your PR team about concerns, pain points, missteps or potential obstacles, you are setting up your messaging partners as well as your organization for potential disaster.  

Could This Be a Problem? 

My favorite example, now 20 years in my professional rear-view window, was when I worked with a large multi-national company. They faced no challenges, and every employee was the best and the brightest professional to be found. During our initial discovery, I asked if there were any areas of concern, topics to avoid or past issues that might create complications with the media. Nothing. The horizon was wide, bright and full of promise, or so I was told. In fact, their leadership team seemed put off by my question. 

Months later, I received a call on a Friday afternoon. One of their executives had been convicted of a crime almost one year prior, and on the upcoming Monday this executive would be in court for sentencing. Could this be a problem, asked my contact from within the company? Emphatically, yes, I responded.  

Because this executive had not worked for the client at the time the charges, and the later conviction, came down, the company’s name had not been connected to the scandal. This executive was not on the list of media-facing representatives of the company, so none of this came to light during discovery. Senior leadership had not been forthcoming, and our team didn’t know this executive was even employed by the client.  

I spent the weekend scrambling to pull together a crisis communications strategy. And while the executive’s conviction led to wall-to-wall media coverage, the client was not mentioned. The media couldn’t imagine, given his crime, that anyone would employ him. But he was a childhood friend of the CEO who helped him with a job while he awaited sentencing. The press simply didn’t investigate his work history post-conviction and LinkedIn wasn’t wildly adopted at the time.  

Because the client wanted to present everything in the most positive light possible, they missed an opportunity to better protect the company, its employees and its customers. In the above example, disaster was averted by dumb luck. In the interconnected, all-online world of today, I don’t believe such a near miss would again be possible. 

Honest Assessments Matter 

No one wants to start a new relationship with dirty laundry. Many a first date has probably tanked a potential relationship by employing absolute candor. While not recommended for a first date, absolute candor is mission critical when onboarding a public relations agency. PR professionals are only as effective as the information clients provide. By failing to share information about challenges, concerns or potential obstacles, clients tie the hands of their agency partners to do their jobs effectively. PR partners are best positioned to help protect client reputations from unnecessary harm, but only if they know the messages to amplify as well as sensitive areas to avoid or plan around. 

If you are considering hiring a public relations agency, the most valuable advice I can offer is to be absolutely candid about the good and bad; what you want to talk about and the issues that keep leadership (and maybe HR) up at night. There is power in doing so, and complete transparency can create an extremely productive partnership to both promote and protect hard-won reputations.

Diddy’s Silence Spoke Volumes: Why Secrets Are Toxic to Crisis Public Relations

Posted on by
Reply

When a brand or a public figure waits too long to tell the truth, they rarely escape the gravitational pull of a crisis unscathed. Whether it’s the ENRON scandal of 2001, Bernie Madoff’s 2009 arrest or the failed 2017 Fyre Festival, one common thread rings true; you can only evade the truth for so long.

Making recent headlines is Sean “Diddy” Combs’ ongoing public downfall. After decades of alleged abuse and misconduct from multiple sources, Combs is facing mounting legal and reputational crises. The musician and producer’s situation is a worst-case scenario from a PR perspective; a stream of headlines that could have been prevented with a wider perspective and proactive approach.

Don’t Let the Crisis Define the Timeline

In May 2024, CNN released a video of Combs from 2016 that showed a violent interaction with his former girlfriend Cassie Ventura after she filed a lawsuit against him in 2023. Allegations quickly began to accumulate, each one painting a more tainted picture than the last. CNN’s video was a turning point for Combs’ case in terms of his reputation and control of the narrative. What could have possibly been one or a few headlines became a viral cultural moment. For months, hundreds of allegations surfaced and by October 2024, an attorney announced he was representing 120 accusers with sexual misconduct allegations against Combs.

For PR to be effective, you cannot allow third parties, in this case the media, to define the narrative. This is paramount. Crisis teams are brought in to either diffuse or help to ensure a factual story, rather than lighting more fires. To do so, public relations professionals need every detail, every time stamp and every skeleton out of the closet from the very start.

Get the All the Facts Out

Secrecy is a dangerous thing in public relations. A slow cadence of new details like in Combs’ situation keeps a story alive and slowly tears down public trust. Letting the PR team know the details, and what might be out there waiting to be found, can give these professionals the tools they need to take a bit of the wind out of the media storm that just won’t seem to quit.

Speaking to your PR team could be viewed similarly to speaking with an attorney insomuch as all the details, warts and all, need to be shared with the PR team, with whom should have a non-disclosure agreement, up front. Being transparent and thorough with the crisis team early on, no matter how difficult, will help businesses avoid a slow leak of damaging stories and details. Sometimes the situation is simply bad, as in the case of Combs. Even in these scenarios, there can be a benefit to taking some measure of responsibility and trying to shape the narrative; not with spin, but with facts and taking a measure or responsibility. While doing so may not mitigate the public’s interest, it can sometimes allow you to get everything out at once which can, in some instances, shorten the lifespan of media coverage and attention. Once a crisis team is equipped with the full scope of a problem, they can work with business leaders to shape a fact-based narrative around it and try to develop a reasonable plan through the situation. Rarely can one avoid or go around a situation like Comb’s without some obvious reputational damage, even under the best of circumstances.

The Value of a Crisis Team That Knows the Right Questions

A good crisis team asks hard questions. They map out worst-case scenarios, poke holes, identify risks and prepare messaging that anticipates the next batch of headlines. They can only do so if they are brought into the room before the cameras start rolling, footage leaks and lawsuits multiply. In Combs’ case, every new, salacious detail draws more coverage and confirms what many had already assumed about the man. That’s the cost of self-preservation. Had his team had the full picture earlier, it may have been less of a sensational story, or at least less frequently publicized, and more focused on accountability.

In Combs’ case, his actions and behaviors have been further reinforced by past tragedies and altercations like his involvement in and reaction to the Heavy D & Puff Daddy Celebrity Charity Basketball Game stampede and the East Coast vs. West Coast hip-hop rivalry that allegedly contributed to the deaths of Tupac Shakur and The Notorious B.I.G. A crisis team will consider how a company’s past mistakes might be uncovered and rehashed in the media as a current crisis unfolds.

Secrets Don’t Age Well

While Combs’ case is particularly extreme for many reasons, any global brand or a public figure could find themselves in a crisis that plays out in the media. And when speaking with a crisis PR team, it is critical to lay all the facts out early. Anything left unsaid can quickly be found by the media, the courts or random sleuths on the internet. Owning the story and being forthcoming with information might not prevent backlash, but it does allow a crisis team the time and details necessary to manage a situation with clarity, compassion and some measure of control to ensure the client’s side of the story is told with care.

Brand Authenticity Requires Communicators to Play Lead Roles

Posted on by
Reply

While brands have a voice in shaping their narratives, it is their publics who play an outsized role in holding organizations to their brand promise and reputation.

One of the best time-tested methods of ensuring adherence to brand authenticity is having a public relations or communications professional at the decision-making table from the start. Failing to do so runs the risk of self-inflicted reputational harm that is extremely difficult, and often expensive to dial back later.

In brands we trust

B2C as well as B2B consumers have vast resources to evaluate brands and a wealth of options from which to choose. Brands that consistently speak to the values and priorities of their consumers engender trust and an emotional connection. According to April 2024 data released from Shopify, 86% of American consumers say authenticity is a key reason they buy or engage with a brand.

Whether it is Red Bull, GE or Salesforce, these companies and others are great examples of organizations that use engaging storytelling, emotionally targeted messaging and brand authenticity to reach and connect with their audiences. We know Red Bull gives you wings. We know GE is focused on imagination at work, and that Salesforce positions you to manage success, not software. Their messaging goes beyond taglines, and their stories resonate with their publics because they meet a need.

What Ben Franklin said

Ben Franklin famously quipped, “It takes many good deeds to build a good reputation, and only one bad one to lose it.” There are countless brands that illustrate Franklin’s point.

The example set by Target regarding its shifting DEI policies has put … well, a target on the Target brand with calls for boycotts and declining sales. Such inconsistent messaging causes brand audiences to reconsider the authenticity and trustworthiness of the organizations at issue. Consumers aren’t sure what, if anything, the brand stands for and repairing that damage will be a long and expensive undertaking.

On the B2B side, there is no more powerful example of reputational damage due to a lack of authenticity—as well as transparency—as WeWork. The company promoted a utopia-style revolution in how workspaces would evolve while leveling the playing field for entrepreneurs to work collaboratively. In reality, the company infamously misled everyone regarding its spending, profitability and stability, leading to a loss of trust among investors and business clients that ultimately led to the founder being ousted and a Chapter 11 filing in 2023.

The power of communications strategy

A chief communications officer with a seat at the leadership table can help organizations adhere to brand authenticity. These professionals are trained to assess the communications risks of any given action by an organization that plays out in front of its publics—internal or external. They help brands avoid unforced errors and plan for a range of responses from their target audiences.

Having that comms professional in the room from the start of major brand decisions can lead to important conversations and questions filtered through a public perception lens, such as:

  • How does this align with the public’s understanding of who we are and what we do?
  • What risks are we taking with this change, and what can we do to mitigate them?
  • Does this change align with our core values?
  • How should we communicate this change clearly to our audiences, and what are the best channels to do so?
  • What is the plan to measure the impact of this change on our brand reputation and perception?
  • What is the backup plan if this change is not well received, and what is the trigger to institute that plan?

Brand leaders are best served when their PR teams challenge group think and work to consider the reaction to organizational change among various audiences. This approach can strengthen and even improve the proposed changes, better aligning them with the brand’s reputation and perception and lead to a smoother introduction to its publics. However, making change better and more sustainable only happens if the communicators are in the room where decisions are made from the beginning. That is how you maintain brand authenticity, and it matters.

Communication Through the Wildfire Crisis – What Should and Should Not Be Said

Posted on by
Reply

The wildfires raging just outside of Los Angeles have burned at least 63 square miles, done an estimated $135 billion in property damage and have claimed at least 25 lives. During crises of this magnitude, it is normal for many to express sympathy online and offer support. We have seen countless positive examples recently. Some take the opportunity to call attention to nonprofits and acknowledge first responders. Others keep their message focused on their industry, community or domain of expertise to help their audiences cope.

Kimball Hughes PR has heard from organizations that wanted to comment amid this recent crisis but were also concerned about appearing opportunistic or insensitive. For those who have similar concerns, we offer the following advice:

Keep your audience in mind

While commenting on breaking news is one way to ensure your comments are timely, it has the potential to backfire.

For instance, imagine you run a business that supports the education of children in distressed municipalities. You could share your support for first responders fighting the Los Angeles fires, but your audience likely cares more about children and education. They may express support for your comments, but unless your business is in the Los Angeles area, your post will just be a drop in an ocean of online support. You may fail to distinguish your message or make a meaningful contribution to your audience. Worse, it could look like you are taking advantage of a tragedy.

Instead, consider addressing how the fire will be impacting children in Los Angeles or how the crisis may negatively impact future efforts to support disadvantaged children in the area. Better yet, mobilize your community to do something that supports your cause while also supporting the children impacted by these fires.

Have a call to action

Audiences have moved beyond statements of thoughts and prayers in times of crisis. They want to see action. If you are compelled to comment on major events, ensure there is a call to action that is both socially sensitive and beneficial to those impacted. Post links to non-profits working to end the crisis and encourage your community to donate or offer support.

Beyond being a force for good, there is a communications angle to consider.  There are countless examples of brands and influencers being put on blast for appearing to leverage tragedy for personal gain. Ensure your efforts in such instances contribute rather than distract or merely add to countless other voices. Be sure your comments support a cause or help mobilize support among your audiences.

It’s not about you, unless it is

When keeping your audience in mind, it’s possible to go too far.  We saw this in 2024 after Hurricane Helene decimated Ashville, North Carolina. Political pundits on both sides of the aisle used the storm as a talking point during a hot election season. In some cases, this led to a cycle of cynicism— with each commentor calling out the prior’s biases and accusing them of using the crisis for their own gain. This month, we are seeing more of the same as pundits condemn California’s regulatory environment. Polarizing comments like these only serve to divide communities and distract from helping victims.

But what if you are directly harmed by a crisis? In this instance, it is of course acceptable to talk about yourself and how the crisis is impacting you — within reason. The line between sharing your perspective and getting on a soapbox is thin. It can be easy to forget others affected by a crisis when you are impacted as well.

Crises —especially natural disasters —raise the stakes for all involved or adjacent to the incident, but the fear of backlash should not stop someone from using their platform as a force for good. By keeping your audience in mind, using your voice as a force for good and staying focused on those impacted, you can both add value to the discussion of the crisis as well as be a force helping to end it.

Recent DEI Shifts Draw Attention to the Importance of Creating, Sticking to Company Brand Values

Posted on by
Reply

Last month, Tractor Supply Co. announced a plan to retire all diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) goals and eliminate all DEI roles at the company. The swift turn away from DEI came in response to a public social media campaign organized to boycott Tractor Supply for their DEI and ESG initiatives and goals.

In today’s social climate, we frequently see businesses pivoting quickly to avoid negative reactions and feedback from customers – whether we’re talking about shifting DEI focus, distancing a brand from a “cancelled” athlete or celebrity or something else. While in some cases, it may make sense to rush to adjust your company’s initiatives based on negative comments or a sudden social movement, some abrupt moves can lead to even more backlash and reputational damage.

Thoughtful planning, strategic thinking and consulting with legal and communications experts can assist your leadership in navigating a situation like this. But one of the best places to start, is to examine your brand values.

What are your brand values?

Brand values are the principles and beliefs of a company that leadership want to project upon consumers. Essentially, these are the key beliefs that guide the operation of the company and consumer perception of a brand. For example, if your business does work in the diversity, equity and inclusion space, then your core values may focus on respect, belonging and creating a culture focused on openness, innovation and handing the ladder down to create a more equitable workplace.

Before coming up with any new programs, creating content, running any media outreach, or organizing a strategic pivot, management should have clearly defined brand values that represent both the company’s goals and growth plans. These values should also align with your target audience and their interests and how you want your company to be viewed by them.

Citing another unfortunate incident in the DEI space, consider the recent controversial decision by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) to remove equity from their DEI strategy. On July 10, SHRM announced it would be moving forward with a focus solely on inclusion and diversity, which came as a surprise to many organization members.

SHRM’s decision was immediately met with intense backlash. Many human resource professionals canceled their SHRM memberships, a petition was started to oppose the decision, and many speakers pulled out of their upcoming conference. Generally, HR executives have found the decision to be disconnected from the core concepts of DEI and feel strongly that SHRM needs an equity-based approach to address workplace issues.

This was a misstep that could have been avoided. SHRM’s data had shown that people were not confident in the direction for progressing certain DEI initiatives. As a result, they ended up pulling back the equity portion. In this decision, they failed to recognize that a large portion of SHRM’s audience is very DEI focused and had been supportive as SHRM played a significant role in expanding DEI efforts across the human resources industry. SHRM’s brand values historically had been aligned with promoting DEI. An abrupt decision to seemingly rewrite their brand values and goals around uncertainty in the direction of the broader DEI movement has led to continued frustration.

Keeping Brand Values in Practice

The loudest voice in the room can be distracting, but leaders need to be careful not to let it be the guiding force behind any decision-making. A company’s brand values should be at the center of any decision. The loudest voice is not always representative of your target audience’s key interests and changing direction rashly without careful thought and professional consultation can lead to reputational damage or ruin.

While society continues to be largely divided on a number of issues, we can likely agree that a decision made in haste without considering your core audience or values, is likely not a smart move.

Before reacting, stop, think and consult with communications professionals. Think: What key messages are we relaying with this move and how will our audience respond?

Public opinion will always shift. That doesn’t mean your brand values should.

Communicating during a cyber crisis – What to do when the network fails

Posted on by
Reply

Two weeks ago, few people had heard of CrowdStrike outside of information technology providers. All it took was one update to be deployed to a live environment on the morning of Friday, July 19 – released before it could be properly tested – for everyone to suddenly learn how pervasive the company’s technology is throughout the world of business. It has been reported by the BBC that over 8.5 million devices were impacted by the global IT outage, including everything from self-check-in kiosks at airports to the cloud networking systems that businesses use to maintain connection with international team members.

The CrowdStrike outage is only the most recent example demonstrating how interconnected the world has become. Nine times out of 10, this interconnectivity works to our benefit in the form of a diverse global economy connected to the best minds and workforces in the world regardless of location. But that one instance when the system fails can lead to panic, business interruption, a chaotic situation and of course, a costly mess.

A massive network disconnection prompts the question, “What do we do now?”

While global outages like this may be largely unavoidable, there are best practices that businesses and individuals can follow so they are prepared for the next time the network goes down.

  • Ensure everyone knows what to do

When Kimball Hughes Public Relations works with businesses to develop communications and crisis communications plans, we prioritize working with our clients to develop steps to take in the event of a cyber-attack or major outage. When digital productivity platforms like Slack or Teams go down, most team members will fall back on another digital platform like email or text messages. But what if those forms of communication have also been disrupted? Do your team members know how to react when they become disconnected?

This is where regular review of communication policies and clear procedures for an emergency come in. These reviews are critical, and communication policies should be accessible to every office member. In addition to procedures, team leads should know who to contact in an emergency and have multiple ways of contacting them via email and telephone. This information should be stored in multiple secure locations, including in an online cloud server and a physical copy should be kept in a secure but accessible location.

  • Create back up plans for your back up plans

Because emergencies are unpredictable by their very nature, it is nearly impossible to predict which systems will go down next time. With the CrowdStrike outage, it was computers running the Windows operating system – but next time it could be Mac, Linux, or maybe even some obscure system the general public has never heard of that manages a major utility. Businesses should have contingencies for every method of communication they use. For example, if email servers go down, teams should be ready to communicate regularly over the phone. If the power goes out, team members should know where to meet in person to remain in sync and decide on next steps.

  • Trust in teams

When teams are armed with the information they need and prepared with clear goals, a business has a better chance of ensuring resiliency during and after crisis periods.

Consider the actions of the airlines during the most recent outage. While flights were grounded and passengers were left in an information blackout, some airline teams deployed lower tech solutions. For example, some moved to writing gate and flight information on whiteboards to keep information moving and calm travelers. While this was not an ideal situation, the team was able to work with the resources they had on hand and in real time, rather than being paralyzed by the outage. This is why regular communications training can be incredibly important. Team members who know what to do with the minimal amount of guidance during an emergency have the best chance of remaining effective until the crisis passes.

When the network goes down, communication channels are usually the first to collapse. By following the above tips, businesses can be sure their teams know how to remain in contact when technology fails.