Category Archives: social media

Guess Who’s Back (Again): PR Lessons From HBO Max’s Return

Posted on by
Reply

There’s no shame in a branding misstep, especially when leadership knows how to recover from it. 

Last month, Warner Bros. Discovery announced the return of “HBO Max,” reversing course from the streaming platform’s 2023 rebrand to simply “Max.” What transpired in the two years since the rebrand offers a valuable lesson in brand strategy: listen to your audience and don’t be afraid to course-correct with a little humility. 

 Where Everybody Knows Your Name 

HBO is a household name, having been around since 1972 and responsible for creating publicly iconic television shows like The Sopranos, Game of Thrones and True Detective. The intention behind the rebrand of HBO Max was to convey the expansive programming that became available when HBO Max and Discovery+ merged. While logically it made sense, decisionmakers at Warner Bros. Discovery underestimated the power of the HBO name.  

HBO has a legacy. Over decades, it has gained worldwide acclaim for releasing shows with unrivaled storytelling and gripping visuals that quickly became cultural phenomenon. Removing the three recognizable and trusted letters confused the public and brand recognition took a hit. At the same time, many viewers and others could not let go of the name by force of habit. 

Recovery Mode  

When Warner Bros. Discovery announced the return of HBO Max, they could have chosen to do the about-face quietly. Afterall, many people never let the original name go. Instead, they embraced their branding 360 with humor and transparency by posting a series of promotional videos that poked fun at the name-change induced chaos. In one video, actors in HBO Max shows and movies joked about the switch, leaning into the very reaction audiences had. This is where Warner Bros. Discovery got it right. 

 Rather than doubling down or defending decisions that led to the failed rebrand, they chose to align with the audience’s perspective. They acknowledged what viewers had already decided, HBO is the brand they trust. The pivot demonstrated to viewers that their voices were not only heard, but worth listening to. 

 Three Takeaways for Brands 

For communications professionals, the HBO Max name change(s) is a masterclass in how to rebound from a branding fail with grace. Consider the following:  

  • If it isn’t broken, don’t fix it: HBO’s switch to Max removed the part of the name that had built the brand’s credibility over decades. HBO took a gamble with brand recognition and while risks can sometimes yield positive returns, this case proved that a strong brand identity is hard to come by. When considering big risk, brands should ensure they are considering their core values, what makes them recognizable and how the proposed change could be perceived by the public.  
  • Listening is part of strategy: Brand decisions may be made in boardrooms, but brand perceptions are crafted by the people. Effective public relations means staying in tune with what audiences want, how they are reacting and how to continue to engage them. In HBO’s case, many continued to refer to the brand’s streaming platform by its original name, rather than accepting the name change. If the public is not willing to jump on board, it might be time to listen, rethink and pivot. 
  • Tone matters. By responding with humor and humility, the platform made the change seem more like a silly stunt gone comically wrong rather than a corporate correction. The audience wasn’t talked down to, they were invited in. In one of the videos, Olivia Cooke, a cast member of House of Dragon, even says “why would you remove the biggest part of the branding?” HBO’s humor around the issue demonstrated transparency, proving to audiences their value while poking a little fun at the corporate blunder.  

Today’s audiences are brand-savvy, and they are not afraid to be critical. They notice when companies fumble and when they truly connect with a brand, they engage. HBO Max’s return is more than a case of a company admitting it was wrong, it serves as a reminder that sometimes the most strategic thing a brand can do is lean into a mistake with transparency, respect for audience feedback and maybe even a touch of humor. 

 HBO Max’s content hasn’t changed, the rebrand just adds clarity. The lesson? Great brands don’t just tell audiences who they are, they listen and meet their audiences where they want to be met. 

When Leadership Talks AI Without Comms, Everyone Loses

Posted on by
Reply

In late April, Duolingo made headlines – not for its quirky language lessons, but for the language used by CEO Luis von Ahn. He announced an “AI-first” shift, positioning it as the nucleus of Duolingo’s business strategy. The intention was clear: innovate, lead the conversation and redefine education technology.

What followed was far from the reception von Ahn hoped to receive.

The criticism was not only focused on the use of AI, but its tone, timing and framing of the news. In particular, von Ahn’s publicly available companywide memo stating the company would “gradually stop using contractors to do work AI can handle” was seen as dismissive of the human cost of that transformation.

In the weeks that followed, Duolingo faced reputational challenges that are increasingly common when major business decisions are made without thorough evaluation of communications strategy. It’s become a timely case study evaluating how even well-intentioned innovations can falter when communications are not treated as a strategic business function.

The gap between strategy and messaging

At its core, Duolingo’s shift to AI reflects an undeniable and broad business trend. Organizations are rapidly adopting generative AI and automation to increase efficiency, reduce costs and improve scalability. While these moves are almost always declared necessary to remain competitive by leadership, they are not neutral.

When business transformation impacts people—particularly the very ones who build it— how leadership communicates matters as much as what is being communicated. In Duolingo’s case, comments from von Ahn emphasizing experimentation and efficiency, combined with previous AI-induced job reductions, raised concerns about whether the company fully considered the human element of its AI strategy.

Those concerns were further compounded by von Ahn’s comments not less than two weeks later, in which he said AI might be better suited than human teachers for educating children. An assertion that not-so-subtly suggests he envisions AI as a replacement for flesh and blood educators. While childcare services and specialized learning environments might still need human educators under such a vision, von Ahn’s remarks demonstrate a disregard for the complexities and nuances required to become a qualified teacher of future doctors, lawyers and engineers.

The absence of a clear, empathetic narrative invited public skepticism. It also created room for assumptions, misinterpretations and reputational risk. All of which undoubtedly will fall on von Ahn’s communications and risk teams to clean up. And despite the fact von Ahn recently tried to clarify his blunder by stating he “does not see AI as replacing what our employees do,” the damage has been done.

What Went Wrong: A Communications Perspective

Beyond the substance of the announcement, the problem lies in the breakdown between leadership and communications teams. When executives bypass or reduce the impact of communications teams in framing sensitive and complex topics like AI adoption or workforce changes, they not only jeopardize public perception but also expose the organization to avoidable reputational and operational risks.

This begs a significant question: How involved should communications teams be on these issues? Here’s what could happen if communications teams’ counsel is seriously considered or implemented:

  • Message discipline is strengthened across leadership: Major strategy pivots, especially those involving significantly disruptive transformations, demand carefully coordinated messaging at every level. When communications teams help shape the narrative early, they can coach executives on tone, timing and terminology, even what to avoid saying to ensure the company speaks with a unified voice.
  • Brand voice stays intact: A well-crafted message reflects the company’s values, not just a single executive’s view. Communications teams help leaders articulate bold visions without losing sight of empathy, humanity or business culture nuances.
  • The “why” remains visible: Change, good change, is easier to understand when stakeholders know the true intentions behind it. Strategic communication ensures bold moves are framed in the right context—how it will benefit users, support employees and position the company for long-term growth.

In Duolingo’s case, this proactive approach might have framed the shift to AI as a long-term value add while investing in talent and partnerships with educators. Rather, it was communicated as a pure efficiency gain and a need to be first to the detriment of human workers.

Lessons for every business leader

The Duolingo episode offers several takeaways for executives considering similar transformations:

  • Innovation is not a substitute for communication: Regardless of how forward-thinking the strategy is, it must be explained in a way that reflects empathy, clarity and foresight.
  • AI announcements require specialized messaging strategies: These are not routine product updates. Anything related to AI adoption must be treated with the same rigor and care as earnings reports, regulatory disclosures or acquisitions.
  • Internal stakeholders are your first audience: If employees feel blindsided, undervalued or expendable, the external message will most certainly fall flat.
  • Reputation is cumulative: Every comment from a CEO builds—or erodes—brand credibility. Once trust is lost, it’s difficult to get it back.

AI is here to stay, and it’s changing the way we operate. But it should also change the way we communicate. The pace of innovation must be matched by the discipline of communications strategy. Otherwise, companies not only risk internal friction and external scrutiny, but also long-term damage to their most valuable asset: trust.

From White Smoke to Bluesky: Uncovering New Ways to Reach Your Audience

Posted on by
Reply

Earlier this month, white smoke emitted from the top of the Sistine Chapel in the Vatican announcing the news that a new pope had been selected to oversee the Catholic Church.  

Cardinals voting in the papal conclave have been burning ballots releasing black smoke from the Vatican since the 1400s. Starting in 1914, the Vatican began to release white smoke to announce the selection of a new pope. This was an effective way to share important news long before the dawn of newspapers, 24-hour cable and streaming news, social media and more. In present day, the news crews that flooded the Vatican to film and report on the color of the smoke to announce the new pope, as well as the many individuals who posted to their own social channels and publishing mechanisms, relayed the message to a global audience.  

From black smoke to white smoke to broadcast news to social media, the vehicles we use to share messaging and raise a brand’s profile are always changing. As public relations professionals, it’s our job to make sure we’re finding your audience where they want to be met—and likely they are all not standing patiently, waiting to hear from you in St. Peter’s Square. New channels are always emerging to open new doors to reach your audience. Consider the following as their own smoke signals, alerting brands and others to new media opportunities:  

Substack is evolving as a legitimate news source as media continues to split off from more traditional channels. Around for several years now, Substack continues to gain credibility as known thought leaders come onboard. Former CNN Chief White House Correspondent Jim Acosta joined Substack earlier this year after leaving the cable news network. The platform allows its users to publish and monetize online newsletters as independent journalists. It also provides a forum for live videos and podcasts. Shortly after launching his presence on Substack, Acosta welcomed 280,000 subscribers. According to New York Magazine, “Substack has escaped its humble newsletter beginnings to become a juggernaut collective of independent voices. If you’re looking to start a media operation, it’s now the place to do so.”  

Bluesky is a microblogging social media platform built on an open-source platform that allows users to move around among online apps. Unlike other well-known social media platforms, Bluesky does not report to one central authority giving posters more freedom and attracting new viewers with more than 30 million users as of last January.   

Open AI is working on its social media platform as well. While no official details have been released, the Verge reported the platform could be based on ChatGPT’s image generation capabilities and possibly integrate it into ChatGPT or launch as its own app. Open AI may benefit by using the data collected from its own social media platform to train its AI. With ChatGPT boasting more than 1 billion users in little more than one year since its launch, a social media platform would open the door to a sizable audience for those who post.  

A good PR professional recognizes and follows the growth and evolution of the media landscape to present opportunities for clients to reach new audiences. Meanwhile, savvy clients have an opportunity to gauge how best to leverage these new mediums to ensure their messaging reaches their target audiences. While not all will become the next LinkedIn, X, or Instagram, it’s critical that marketing and comms teams pay attention.  

Like the smoke at the Sistine Chapel hundreds of years ago, these platforms are informing your audience about your brand. With the help of a smart PR team, you can find the right channels to meet your audience where they want to be met and raise your visibility, credibility and if all goes as planned, indirectly sales. 

To Speak or Not to Speak: How Brands Approach Difficult Topics

Posted on by
Reply

There’s nothing worse than someone butting into a conversation, only to add nothing of substance. It’s unnecessary, ruins a potentially productive discussion and leaves participants unsure about what to take from the interaction. It’s the same with brands taking a stance on national headlines.

The instinct to speak up about a nationally relevant, political issue or story was not born from thin air. In 2019, a Sprout Social study showed 70% of consumers found it important for brands to take a stance on social and political issues. But in a more recent study in 2023, Sprout Social reported 58% of consumers found it inappropriate for brands to speak about politics.

Why the change of heart and where does that leave brands now? A good communications team can help you weigh the risks and benefits of speaking out, keep a pulse on public sentiment and protect your brand from unforced errors.

Missing the Mark

Consumer cynicism about corporate politics stems in large part from years of perceived hollow messaging and little-to-no-action supporting the issues a brand claims to stand for. When protests following the murder of George Floyd erupted across the country in 2020, many businesses took the opportunity to share statements showing solidarity against racism. But not all messages were received positively.

It became easy for the public to recognize brands that had rushed to craft a statement or post a black square on their social media feeds because they felt they had to join the conversation. In the case of companies that chose to join the conversation around George Floyd’s murder like Netflix, with a reported track record at the time of regularly canceling shows led by diverse casts, the public reaction was anger. As more companies faced accusations of releasing statements with no authenticity or follow through, the public call for tangible action by these very companies to support the communities they claimed solidarity with grew louder.

Know Your Brand and Be Prepared

There is no single answer to the question of whether your company should take a stance on a public issue. It depends. However, it’s critical that strategic communications and public relations professionals play a lead role in these discussions and at every step of the decision-making process. Together with your team, they can take a strategic assessment of the situation, considering the following:

  • Your brand’s core values. Reflect on your company’s core values and ensure any outgoing message is consistent. A statement contradicting a tenet of your company’s mission can muddle your audience’s understanding of your organization’s identity.
  • Your audience. If your organization hasn’t previously discussed the issues at hand but believes it could score points with a new audience, it’s important to understand a statement on a sensitive issue likely should not be your first step. Instead, your PR team can help you to strategically find ways to gradually build visibility and credibility with a new audience through earned media and more. Otherwise, you risk leaving previously loyal consumers feeling left behind and the perception of seeking to profit from an unfortunate event.
  • The risks. Political or social justice issues can be incredibly divisive. It’s important to know that no matter what, putting out a statement is bound to ruffle feathers and turn people away from your brand. If your company determines issuing a statement is sensible, it’s always smart to work with your team to develop a plan should your statement not be received as expected. A good PR team can help you prepare a comprehensive crisis strategy.
  • Your value-add. Polite platitudes with no real action or investments to support an issue could end up hurting your brand, rather than helping. Even consumers who generally agree with the sentiment of your message could potentially see it as offensively hollow. The last thing you want is to be accused of using an important issue for profit, so make sure your organization’s addition is thoughtful and substantive, and remember, actions speak louder than words.

With more and more channels to voice opinions from X to Threads to Bluesky and LinkedIn, we’re seeing brands fighting for the spotlight on multiple fronts. While it may be tempting to weigh in on the hot social issue of the moment to attract viewers, it’s critical to consider one poorly received post can cause untold damage to a brand’s reputation. The right public relations partner can help you consider every angle and highlight potential blind spots before you decide to wade into murky waters.

Hello Procrastinators: A Look at REAL ID Chaos and Communications

Posted on by
Reply

Whether it’s evidenced by crowds at retailers on Christmas Eve or the onslaught of extension requests sent to the Internal Revenue Service on April 15 each year, it appears America has its fair share of procrastinators. And the current chaos around the U.S. government’s REAL ID deadline only further proves that is another case in point. While there is no surefire way to win over the most stubborn procrastinators, a thoughtful communications campaign to raise awareness is a good place to start.  

A Real Problem 

The deadline—which had been moved numerous times previously— to obtain a REAL ID is May 7, 2025. The REAL ID initiative stems from a recommendation from the 9/11 Commission to establish more universal standards for identification cards and drivers’ licenses to increase security and reduce fraud. After May 7, the REAL ID will be required for Americans to board commercial aircraft, enter certain federal facilities or enter nuclear power plants. 

While the REAL ID initiative has been in play for 20 years, the “real” deadline seems to have come as a surprise for some. CBS News just reported that for people polled in a set of 30 states, fewer than 70% of residents who meet the requirements have a REAL ID. They also found, in 17 other states, fewer than 50% of the eligible population had obtained a REAL ID. 

With just several days until the deadline, Americans are scrambling, worried they will have difficulty boarding flights while airports are readying their teams for long lines and frustrated travelers. But is all of this confusion and delay due to a lack of communication?  

Communicating REAL ID 

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security seemed to understand the assignment. They knew getting Americans educated about the REAL ID requirement and encouraging them to act might be a heavy lift. They also recognized a good public awareness campaign embracing a flurry of marketing and PR initiatives would be key.  

The department launched its “Be your REAL ID self” campaign in January 2021 with digital toolkits for government agencies and industry partners to share communications and marketing materials on their websites and social media, as well as through direct mail and on-site signage. And while Homeland Security had its own communications initiatives, individual states went out to try to stave off delays and discord as the deadline neared. For example, last June, Oregon’s Department of Transportation posted it was in search of a firm to launch an advertising and marketing campaign with a $500k budget to help raise awareness ahead of the transition.   

As to public relations specifically, when I asked ChatGPT how many news articles had been written about REAL ID, it said, “​While there isn’t a precise count of all news articles written about REAL ID, it’s clear that the topic has garnered extensive media coverage since the REAL ID Act was enacted in 2005.” Coverage was found in NPR, The Washington Post, CBS News, ABC News, The Associated Press and more. With significant media coverage and a multi-faceted marketing campaign, the public likely knew about the REAL ID deadline; If they failed to act on the information or are simply procrastinating, perhaps that is on them.  

Regardless of whether you see the REAL ID roll out as a communications success or failure, it’s important to understand the elements of a good public awareness campaign.  

  • Understand your goal and your audience: The shifting of deadlines in years past likely complicated the government’s efforts to achieve the goal of getting Americans to meet the May 7th deadline. A good campaign will have a clear achievable goal to raise awareness, draw people to a website, attract sales, etc. 
  • Encourage idea sharing between PR and marketing: In a complex campaign like this, the marketing and PR teams were likely talking to one another. Too often, the teams are expected to work in a vacuum. This can lead to missed opportunities, doubled efforts and conflict. 
  • Develop clear and consistent messaging: Clear consistent messaging is critical because no matter how often someone hears a message, procrastinators will delay. The message should be clear – in this case, explaining what needs to be done, why and when. 
  • Conduct proactive, persistent and regular outreach: A PR team should be regularly talking to media on your behalf. Reporters tend to stay away from promotional material, but any time you can tie your initiatives to a timely event or trend, you are more likely to gain a reporter’s attention. 
  • Leverage social media: Along the lines of the value of repeated messaging above, be sure to leverage social media. Share updates and links to news coverage, consider surveys and more to build engagement. 
  • Engage ambassadors: The REAL ID team wisely tried to tap into industry partners and government offices for support. Trusted members of the community or people with whom your audience is in regular contact can be valuable resources in sharing your key messages and getting audiences to act. 

Despite delays and extensions in recent years, it seems the May 7th deadline for the REAL ID may be … real. While considerable efforts were made to ensure the public was ready, many remain unprepared for the transition. Those who are prepared likely acted on some part of the communication campaign. Those who have not likely heard the call but chose to put it off until tomorrow. 

What to Expect from a PR Agency As the Pitching Pool Grows Shallower  

Posted on by
Reply

Journalists are outnumbered. As the public relations industry has welcomed more communicators into the field, news outlets nationwide have faced massive layoffs that have vastly reduced the number of reporters and editors.  

Between 2023 and 2033, the public relations industry workforce is expected to grow by 6%, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. There are now more than seven public relations professionals for every journalist and with some reporters receiving over 100 emails a day, finding a way to grab and keep their attention is critical for any pitching effort.  

It’s tough breaking through an already congested news cycle without the uneven personnel ratio making competition for attention even more difficult. This growing ratio should impact your vetting process when considering your next communications firm or in evaluating the effectiveness of your current agency.  

Consider the following questions when evaluating a PR partner or prospective partner:  

  • Do They Do their Homework? Relevance is the name of the game. Before any good media relations pro jumps into writing, they make sure the topic is relevant to the interests of an outlet’s readership and personalize the pitch to target the reporter’s specific beat. If a reporter sees a pattern of irrelevant pitches coming from your company, they will be quick to ignore outreach from your PR team, and potentially your company, in the future. 
  • Do They Know How to Tell a Story that Matters to Your Audience? Every pitch entering a journalist’s inbox needs to be concise, clear, compelling, nonpromotional and ideally speak to an industry trend or hot topic. Context is important, but the goal is to offer proof points about meeting the needs and interest of the audience not promoting the company or brand.  Working with an agency staffed with former journalists can help. 
  • Do They Work with Urgency? No one likes having their time wasted, especially a journalist on a deadline. You need a PR firm to position you as a ready resource for a reporter, not as unreliable or unprepared.  
  • Can They Build Relationships? If a pitch is compelling enough to break through the static and engage an editor or reporter, a good media relations pro should use it as an opportunity for relationship-building. If a journalist recognizes your company’s subject matter experts as reliable and relevant to their audience, it can open the door to future opportunities. After all, it’s about what you know in today’s media environment, not who you know. That said, rapport is still important. Your PR rep should be proactively identifying reporters relevant to your industry, talking to them with regularity to understand what they are working on, as well as offering introductory meetings to ensure your subject matter experts are on their radar for future stories.  

Public relations pros cannot change the media landscape, but the good ones are adapting by taking the time to understand the current state of journalism and recalibrating where needed. Business owners and leaders will want to make sure they are working with PR partners who get it. 

It’s called earned media for a reason, and while there is never a guarantee for coverage, these tips could help you find the agency that can make your company’s engagement with journalists stand out among a sea of mundane, irrelevant, promotional or just plain old uninteresting pitches.  

Houston, We Have a Problem: A Female First Campaign Lost in Space

Posted on by
Reply

Pop star Katy Perry, news anchor Gayle King and four other high-profile women launched into space this week with high hopes of inspiring a swell of female empowerment. But, the Blue Origin 11-minute flight—carrying six glamorous women in full make up, donning matching blue, fitted spacesuits —did not resonate with the public as intended. Instead, it launched a chorus of criticism by celebrities and others who bashed the event as tone deaf and an empty show of feminism.

So, what went wrong? How did this “one giant stunt for womankind,” as a critic from The New York Times called it, go wrong and how might a different comms approach have produced a more positive outcome?

Exploring the Issue

The flight was part of the New Shepard program at Blue Origin, founded by billionaire Jeff Bezos. In announcing the flight, the women described the trip as an endeavor to encourage STEM careers and female empowerment, according to interviews with Elle.

The rocket, which pilots itself, carried Perry and King, as well as aerospace engineer Aisha Bowe, civil rights activist Amanda Nguyen, film producer Kerianne Flynn, and Lauren Sanchez, a journalist and Bezos’s fiancée. Even though the women were not space professionals, the Blue Origin team labeled the group as the rocket’s “astronaut crew.”  Blue Origin described them as storytellers who inspire others —as advocates for students in STEM (Science Technology, Engineering and Mathematics), civil rights, philanthropy, overcoming adversity and more.

While the trip may have been designed to encourage girls to consider STEM careers, the women aboard were seen as space tourists. They were not operating the rocket or fulfilling any astronaut responsibilities and left audiences reaching to connect them with STEM.

Upping Their Game

Could the right communications approach have changed the outcome here? Maybe. However, we do see a few areas where Blue Origin could have better executed this mission.

  • Authenticity in messaging: Blue Origin thought they were planning a mission to inspire young girls and women to explore new careers, but the wealthy, well-connected women selected to participate did not relate well to audiences. Brands need to ensure their messaging is authentic, compelling and connects to their audiences. The public watching and reading about the launch are not millionaires or billionaires who can afford the undisclosed ticket price. Audiences might have better received a passenger manifesto made up of successful women in STEM, rather than celebrities and journalists.
  • The brand’s reputation: Amazon, also founded by Bezos, has a reputation for disregarding the environment with its packaging and fleet of delivery vehicles in constant motion across the globe. While Blue Origin claims to be sustainably minded using reusable rockets and researching ways to encourage sustainability through space exploration, many viewed the rocket launch as damaging to the environment, as well as a waste of resources when many are experiencing financial hardship. Blue Origin may have been better served by hosting more female scientists like Bowe on the mission, conducting research to further sustainability, and creating messaging to show how those initiatives might connect to the brand.
  • Optics: Full-makeup, perfect blow-outs and designer matching spacesuits set a new tone for space exploration. Blue Origin’s comms team should have considered the optics of the women posing in slinky suits with professional makeup and hair. The comms team should have considered suggesting attire that looked less Hollywood and more professional rather than monied glamour.
  • Leveraging post-event energy: After the women returned to Earth and interviews were conducted, audiences were left feeling flat. Perhaps a post-event press conference with the women talking about the next steps for advancements in STEM for females, for which this mission has opened doors, would have conveyed a real commitment, garnered more attention and furthered a goal of female empowerment.

While the launch gained plenty of media attention, the resulting backlash has not benefited Blue Origin or the six women who chose to board the rocket. When considering a media stunt or event, be sure to think strategically. Not doing so could leave your brand identity lost in space.

Get to Know Senior Advisor John Forberger

Posted on by
Reply

Public relations is all about relationships—the people behind the stories. That’s why we’re offering this blog series all about our team members. This isn’t about our professional accomplishments but who we are as people. We hope you have as much fun reading along as we do interviewing each other.

What got you interested in public relations?

    In the early 2000s, I led marketing teams for multiple Miami real estate developers. One role involved maintaining a steady media presence in targeted local and national outlets, highlighting our projects and CEO to attract buyers and landowners. I recognized that getting media attention on topics I was passionate about, for equally passionate people, never felt like work. Throughout my career, my favorite part of public relations has been identifying and shaping the messaging that brings companies, product lines or projects to life.

    Tell us about your favorite movie and what appeals most to you about it?

    During film school, in a galaxy far, far away, I saw Citizen Kane. Every frame and angle mesmerized me, maybe because they were still so atypical. It doesn’t look like anything else. I wonder if the care for filmmaking at that level of detail can still be possible? I like to think there is someone out there who can and is trying to do better right now. The determination to make a strong statement in cinematic history really moves me.

    Tell us about a meaningful hobby or “outside of work” commitment that is important to you?

    Maintaining the plants on the property my wife and I share is a healthy, busy hobby I look forward to. I see myself as being loyal to the plants and animals around us. In total silence, I learn something each time I go outside whether on my own or through Google Lens. The simple experience of watching pineapples change colors from green to blue to purple to gold to brown, for example, is incredible. Feeling useful to our mini ecosystem by doing things like removing invasive vines and plants is rewarding, and the bonus of all the positive health benefits that come with gardening is great!

    Share a fun fact about you.

    My wife and I have driven across nearly every Canadian province with our 17.5-year-old “super senior” beagle mix Abby. She even joined us on the ferry to Vancouver Island when we lived in downtown Victoria for a month.

    April Fools: Messaging Blunders That Should Be a Joke But Aren’t

    Posted on by
    Reply

    I wish I was joking. What follows really ought to be an exercise in April Fool’s frivolity and humor. Unfortunately, the only thing foolish about what follows is these brand communications efforts were undertaken with some level of intent or ineptitude that resulted in public embarrassment for some or all involved.

    With that, I offer the top five most April Fool’s-worthy communications that really should have been overseen by a competent public relations professional:

    1. Mixed Signals: On March 24, some of the Trump Administration’s most senior leadership commiserated over an imminent, and then later completed, attack on Houthi rebels in Yemen who are accused of carrying out missile and drone attacks on shipping lanes in the Red Sea. They did so via an app called Signal, a free open-source and encrypted messaging app, the use of which by government employees has, to date, been discouraged by the federal government. That group chat included a well-known U.S. journalist, leading to an embarrassment of sometimes competing explanations, excuses and denials that anything sensitive was shared. They tried to chalk it up to something like a fat-thumbs-texting-moment where you didn’t mean to text your ex, but you did and now you very deeply regret it.
    2. Oh Boya, a Press Release from Goya: In a what-medication-was-he-on-moment, Goya Foods CEO Bob Unanue issued an ill-considered, rambling and seemingly pointless self-published press release in February announcing his new, but extremely unclear chapter after the Goya board allegedly voted him out. The release included a stream-of-consciousness quote from Unanue about child trafficking. File this one under friends don’t let CEOs self-publish press releases.
    3. Dude, Where’s My Car?: Jaguar went full SNL/Calvin Klein commercial crazy late last year when it rolled out its new branding in a techno-beat, multiracial, gender-bending, psychedelic-color driven ad campaign that seemed to offer a little bit of everything … except its iconic automobiles. While trying to defend the company’s rebrand as “bold” and “imaginative,” the public seemed to respond with a collective eye-roll and complete dismissal of one of the most confusing rebrands/commercials of the modern era.
    4. Finger-licking Eh: In 2024, McDonald’s—the bastion of Big Macs and Dollar Menus—took a bold step in introducing its first beauty product line. In partnership with beauty brand Nails.INC, Mickey D’s created a line of nail products that mirrored its brand colors in polishes, along with stickers and a French-fry-inspired French manicure. Ironically, the fast-food giant has a standing policy that does not allow employees to wear nail polish. The campaign ended almost as quickly as it was announced as the public did not seem to be lovin’ it.
    5. Ain’t Mis-Bee-haven: Spring was in the air, but a 2024 campaign proved to be a buzzkill for dating app Bumble after it introduced a series of advertisements advocating against celibacy. It was an ill-considered attempt to humorously address dating frustrations related to dating apps. Backlash was swift, with women’s organizations and others noting women choose celibacy for a range of reasons, including safety, reproductive rights and more. With its wings clipped, Bumble quickly reversed course and ended the campaign with a commitment to help support domestic violence organizations.

    If there is a takeaway or lesson across all these situations it is this: Avoid becoming a fool, in April or any other month, by ensuring your internal or external comms teams have a say in all brand communications. Public relations pros know how to manage the message as well as alert senior leaders of potential, unforced errors that can place a dunce cap high-atop the brand’s reputation.

    Play Ball! Grand Opening Tips Inspired by Major League Baseball’s Opening Day

    Posted on by
    Reply

    Coined by many as the “official start of spring,” millions of people around the U.S. look forward to Major League Baseball’s (MLB) Opening Day every year. Whether fans are attending games in person, watching live on television or from their mobile devices, the start of MLB continues to draw national attention year after year.

    While local businesses do not have the MLB’s platform or budget, business owners can draw inspiration from Opening Day to maximize their grand opening events. When done correctly, a grand opening can serve as a homerun for your business growth strategy. When approached as just another to-do among many, owners can miss a key opportunity to introduce their businesses to the community and generate excitement among potential customers. Just like the MLB’s Opening Day, a new business needs to give the public something to root for.

    Hitting it out of the park

    MLB’s Opening Day stirs up excitement among fans and provides an opportunity to showcase new rosters and skills. Grand openings can give new businesses a chance to call on future fans to consider their goods or services while shining stadium-style bright lights on the business itself. To make the most of a grand opening, business leaders should plan effectively, tap into the local community and engage the media with a meaningful story.

    • Have an impactful plan: To draw in the community, business owners need to host an attention-worthy event. While they could simply open the doors and hope for the masses to come walking in, the results would likely be disappointing. When planning an event, business owners should consider their clientele, what might motivate them to visit and how they can engage them once they have arrived. Food and refreshments, partnering with local vendors, coordinating donations to local charities, selling raffles or providing activities for children are great places to start. Details should be highlighted in all marketing efforts. 
    • Tap into the community: Community involvement is a crucial asset in the process of opening a business. From collecting insights from fellow business owners, to building a repeat customer base, community support is irreplaceable. Business owners should consider inviting local dignitaries, business connections and key community members in the area to the grand opening. It is important to have enough lead time to send out invitations, secure a spot on community calendars and promote the event. Social media groups and community bulletins can also be effective tools in getting the word out.
    • Engage the media: When trying to promote a grand opening, there is no substitute for media coverage. Print and broadcast exposure can reach a much broader audience than a business owner might on their own. While advertising with local media is an option, earned media provides valuable visibility without added costs. The key, however, is to identify what makes a particular grand opening, or business in the area special or newsworthy. The opening alone may not rise to the level of newsworthiness in some communities.

    When we look to the MLB, we see they are selling more than the story of baseball on Opening Day; they are tapping into the emotional side of their fan bases. For example, after a disappointing 2022 season, the Texas Rangers made a triumphant return in 2023, winning their Opening Day series and later securing a World Series championship. Similarly, business owners should offer a story to the media about their business that connects with the community beyond simply telling the public there is a grand opening event happening.  

    A successful grand opening can position a new business for consistent growth, whereas a disappointing one can leave owners struggling to build momentum. A public relations agency or local freelance PR specialist could be a great resource to help effectively promote a grand opening, conduct media and community outreach and brainstorm ideas that might resonate with the public.

    Just as baseball fans look forward to MLB’s Opening Day each year, a business’s grand opening should be an event that speaks to the business’ potential fan base. MLB’s Opening Day is something that is carefully planned and considered by all involved. A business’ grand opening deserves no less attention.