Author Archives: Rod Hughes

Unknown's avatar

About Rod Hughes

I'm a writer, bibliophile, witty wordsmith and generally a commentator on the world around me. Professionally, I am a partner and vice president of a Greater Philadelphia-based public relations agency that helps businesses get their messages out into the world in a positive, effective way. Kimball Hughes Public Relations also specializes in helping organizations manage crisis communications situations. Contact me at rhughes@kimballpr.com.

Paid Content: Is It Worth It?

Posted on by
Reply

My discussions around paid content, for many years, typically went something like this:

Client: Hi. Amazing Media just emailed saying they want to feature our CEO as the best business influencer of [fill in month or year]. Is this legit? I’ve never heard of this outlet. Would you check it out for us?

Me: Sure. I suspect this is a pay-for-play opportunity, and it can come with a big price tag. Also, because you’re unfamiliar with this outlet, I suspect it won’t hit the target audience most important to your company. We’ll check it out and get back to you with a recommendation.

My colleagues and I would investigate and, with varying degrees of obfuscating from the outlets at issue, we would find it was a pay-for-play opportunity and often recommend to our clients to steer clear.

Sometimes these were paid broadcast interviews with fading celebrity hosts. Often these interviews would air at 3 a.m. on Sundays on some wildly obscure television station or streaming platform no one I have ever met would admit to watching. At other times, they involved free publications (meaning no one asked for them) so broad in nature that the concept of a specific target audience was practically a joke. In some limited circumstances, these paid opportunities were with good outlets, however, they were often still slightly off-target and, therefore, not worth the investment. In my 20 years in public relations, I have seen these types of unsolicited opportunities range from $2,500 to more than $80,000 for a one-shot deal.

So, of course, for many years I scoffed at these outlets and felt a duty to protect my clients from being taken advantage of.

However, the landscape of journalism is changing and, increasingly, we see paid-content opportunities with legitimate media outlets of value to some of our clients. With shrinking newsrooms and ongoing media consolidation requiring more revenue growth, some of these opportunities are – with a limited few industry trades – becoming de rigueur.

The question, of course, is, are they worth the investment? My evolved answer is, it depends. If the audience aligns with your target audience specifically, not generally, then maybe. The costs should also not exceed 2 to 5% of your total marcom budget for the year. If it’s more, it likely isn’t worth it for a single opportunity. Finally, you want to maintain control over the content for which you are paying. Don’t accept the default writer assigned to you from the outlet. I have seen this go very badly and at great, nonrefundable cost to the clients involved. Insist on your own, vetted and knowledgeable writer and maintain final veto authority on the content and the art that might accompany it.

Paid content, in this dynamic information age, is no longer something to be immediately scoffed at or ignored. Increasingly, this type of content should be built into your marcomm strategy, but carefully.

The Stories We Tell About Insurance Must Change

Posted on by
Reply

For years our agency founder, Gary Kimball, talked about how the insurance industry has an image problem. I continue to share that sentiment.

It’s akin to a plane crash. This time of year, millions of us climb into aluminum/composite tubes to be flung hundreds of miles per hour at 30,000 feet or more to visit family and friends. We do this, mostly, with confidence and not much concern about the airline industry until we learn of an incident of some kind. Suddenly, some are afraid to fly … because of one incident.

Whether it is capacity issues, carriers leaving certain states or regions, rising premiums, the talent crisis or denial of claims, these seemingly jolting situations are a mere fraction of the total contribution of one of the few industries that, without exaggeration, not only helps us in a time of need, but underpins every foundation of our society.

So, what is the solution?

Insurance leaders need to lean into what the industry, and individual companies, enable in the world. The messaging going forward needs to focus less on balance sheets, premium, products and capacity. Instead, a long-term image campaign is required. To do this successfully, a full-throated and relentless discourse is needed on the successes and enablement insurance provides across our society, in things large and small.

  • Businesses can expand – and create jobs – because they have insurance to protect them in the event of an “incident,” whatever that might mean to the business.
  • Technologies can be explored, developed and deployed because insurance exists to protect organizations and entrepreneurs from misapplications or hardware failures.
  • Each of us can invite friends and family to our homes, regardless of season, weather and other conditions, with the reassurance that if a guest trips or gets hurt, there is insurance to protect them and us from financial devastation.
  • Holiday gifts, as well as mission-critical medical equipment, can be shipped around the world without fear of loss or damage because these items are insured.
  • Life-saving treatments can be developed because the scientists and doctors doing the work are covered in case something goes wrong, ensuring the entire enterprise isn’t lost to the detriment of those who depend on these treatments.
  • Volunteers can support charitable events and serve on the boards of nonprofits doing social good because insurance shields them from junk lawsuits or legitimate, but not malicious, errors in action or judgement.
  • You can buy your $1,000 smartphone and rest assured two days later when you drop it that you have insurance to cover the repair or replacement without breaking the bank.
  • And those aluminum/composite tubes can help us get home to our families for the holidays because insurance protects them from complete disaster in even the most minor of errors, delays or missteps.

These and other messages are what consumers, potential industry recruits, business executives, homeowners, nonprofit leaders and others need to hear. In this moment, as we brace for a new year and all the challenges that come with it, we need to change the industry’s approach to its perpetual image problem.

I have spent a career reporting on, adjacent to and supporting the insurance industry. I am a convert. Despite the occasional bad press, there is so much the industry does that makes the world go round. We simply need to tell those stories, often, and starting now.

Weighing your Options: Pay-to-Play Media Coverage

Posted on by
Reply

While not a novel concept, the idea of pay-to-play media coverage has recently made a resurgence. Organizations, many off-shore, are engaging in an aggressive strategy of cold email outreach to businesses and non-profits offering to secure guaranteed placement of news coverage or thought leadership. What’s more, these organizations assure their prospects there is “absolutely no payment” until the placement is secured.

You don’t pay a penny unless you get your message published or broadcast. Sounds great, right?

Remember, if it sounds too good to be true it probably is.

They Think You’re Great

The email reads well. It is gracious and solicitous, although there is sometimes the occasional typo or grammatical error. These emails seeking to engage you even include a little detail about your company, non-profit or you personally. A nice touch. They seem legit. You can even find their website, although the only button that links to anything is a “Contact Us” selection.

Typically, when a company you never heard of comes calling offering you a remarkable opportunity, it’s a sales pitch, not a legit offer.

Also, often there’s no human behind these emails. These emails are artificial intelligence (AI) generated. They’ve scraped your website for a few details about you or your organization. And they will keep emailing, seeming to wonder why you haven’t replied.

The Fine Print

Despite claims to the contrary, there are a few details absent from these sales tactics.

The first is the outlets in question. Many of these solicitors highlight amazing media outlets: Forbes, CNN, FOX, The Financial Times, Yahoo Business News, etc. What they fail to mention is they are targeting the advertising or sponsored sections or segments of these outlets. What does that mean?

In the case of Forbes, they will sign you up for a paid opportunity you could have secured on your own. What’s more, if you worked directly with Forbes, you would likely be paying to become a regular contributor, writing and publishing up to 11 or 12 articles per year (all labeled as paid or contributed content). But with the model offered by these pay-to-play organizations, you will pay significantly more than the annual Forbes Contributor fees for just one opportunity. They are counting on you not knowing how Forbes, and other outlets, work regarding paid placement and costs.

Where broadcast outlets are concerned, it’s a near guarantee you won’t be appearing on Fox & Friends or Anderson Cooper 360. More likely your brief, paid segment, will run on the backwaters of these outlets’ websites in special “Sponsored Content” sections or on a 3 a.m. Sunday morning broadcast segment with a D-list celebrity host.

Also, for many B2B organizations, the outlets targeted are not strategic to fit their unique target audiences. If your target audience are the readers of Horse & Hound magazine, then a 2 a.m. Saturday segment on TBS is not exactly on point. Sure, you may be reaching a potentially large audience (insomniacs everywhere will be delighted), but is that audience the one you need? In short, these placements are tactical, not strategic.

The Cost

They promise you won’t pay anything until a placement is secured. But when you do, brace yourself. A single placement in Forbes, as an example, could run you two to three times what Forbes charges to be an annual contributor. Not exactly money well spent. And the broadcast placements can be simply astronomical (so they will push you to secure a CNN.com article instead because it’s much cheaper … or so it seems).

Competency

Finally, it comes down to turning over your brand or your personal reputation to individuals and organizations that have no track record in public relations outside of paid placements. They are basically placing paid-advertisements for you (and typically the outlets are doing the writing, not the so-called agency you hired).


And what happens if there’s a problem? What if there’s a mistake or worse? What if the paid opportunity mutates into a crisis situation? Well, these organizations have been paid. Not only do they have no reputation management or crisis communications experience, they don’t offer those services or care to help you. It’s pay-to-play, and you will certainly get what you pay for but likely, not one little thing more.

To cultivate and advance your reputation, a journalist must see a legitimate story and make an independent decision as to whether to cover it or not. There is not a public relations agency on earth that can make The New York Times or CBS News run a story that isn’t deemed newsworthy.

Where paid content is available with major media outlets, the value is limited. Make sure you understand both the benefits and limitations of any paid content opportunity as well as who and when actual humans will have access to that content.

Beware the public relations person who guarantees success. The success you achieved in business, as a non-profit leader or other professional endeavors was never guaranteed from the start. Neither is public relations.

Protect Your Investment: Know What to Ask When You are Hiring a Public Relations Agency

Posted on by
Reply

Throughout my 20 years in public relations, I – and my colleagues – have found ourselves frequently playing clean-up after another public relations agency has failed to deliver what was promised to a client.

When I talk with organizations that have worked with PR agencies in the past, typically six out of 10 tell me the relationship ended badly. The reasons tend to fall into a few familiar categories:

  • Poor communication between the agency and the client
  • Frequent agency staff turnover
  • Meeting senior agency leaders at the pitch meeting, but only interacting with less-experienced agency personnel after the contracts are signed
  • Lack of alignment either on strategy, content, writing quality, values and personalities

Like any professional or personal relationship, there is likely a bit of blame to be had on both sides when an investment by both parties in achieving a successful public relations partnership fails.

However, in my experience, often these agency hiring misfires could have been avoided if the right questions had been asked in the agency screening process. Understanding who you are hiring and establishing shared expectations from the start can help ensure the relationship starts off as strongly as possible. To do so, there are five key questions I recommend asking your potential public relations agency during the screening process, including:

  1. What distinguishes your agency from your competition?
  2. Will you include former clients in your list of references that we can contact?
  3. Who will serve as the account manager, and can we meet him or her before signing the agreement?
  4. If the plan you create for us isn’t working out, what is your pivot strategy to ensure success?
  5. Please describe your ideal working relationship with clients so we can level-set expectations both from our perspective and among the agency team.

Additional questions you should consider asking any public relations agency you might be looking to hire should include:

  • What kind of response time can I expect from your team to my emails, texts or phone calls?
  • If the account manager isn’t a member of senior leadership, what role will leadership play in the development and execution of our public relations plan?
  • What is your process for learning about our organization, and how long should we expect that process to take?
  • How will you help us prepare for any media interviews you might secure on our behalf?
  • Can we see samples of your writing relevant to our industry or organization type?
  • What kind of time commitment should we expect to make to ensure our work with the agency is a success?
  • Please describe the frequency and type of ongoing communication you expect to have with our organization throughout the engagement.

Asking the right questions will help you get a better sense of the agency you are potentially hiring as well as how they intend to engage with you.

Too many business and nonprofit leaders ask questions of public relations agencies that either cannot be answered in the initial pitch meeting or demonstrate a lack of understanding of how public relations works. In our next blog, we’ll cover questions you shouldn’t ask in these initial meetings if you want to be taken seriously while also making the most of the time you do have to evaluate if the agency at the table or on a video call is a good fit.

Remember, public relations is more than an investment of money. It’s one of time, effort and trust. Knowing what to ask will help ensure those you ultimately hire are worthy of that investment.

5 Steps to Navigating a Crisis Situation

Posted on by
Reply

Planning your escape while your house is engulfed in flames is, arguably, the worst time to try to develop an escape plan. Surprisingly, countless business leaders take this approach to crisis communications management; trying to make a plan to save the business as metaphorical flames lick at their hands and feet.

The smart move is to have a comprehensive crisis communications plan in place long before you need to use it. However, given the relative lack of thoughtful crisis communications planning among many organizations, the next best strategy is to try to navigate the crisis as best as possible without getting too badly burned.

If your business or non-profit lacks a crisis communications plan, but you find yourself trying to manage a crisis situation, here are five steps you can take to try to minimize the damage:

Gather the Facts

The worst thing an organization can do early in a crisis is make assumptions or speculate. The outcome of your crisis will be shaped largely by your initial response. What can you verify? Start with what happened, when, who was involved and how you expect this event to impact your organization’s stakeholders and the public. Keep emotion out of it, recognizing emotions will run high in a crisis. Remember, we all have different perspectives and opinions when we’re asked to recount a situation. This is where you must insist on only dealing with verifiable facts.

Assemble Your Team

Typically, this includes one or more people in leadership, your organization’s attorney and one or more crisis communications professionals; either your in-house communications person or an experienced public relations agency specializing in crisis work. Empower the team to examine the situation and guide the course of how you will message to internal and external audiences.

Take Control of All Communications

From answering phones and the receptionist greeting guests to the intern handling your social media and the company daily email newsletter, your crisis communications team has to have complete control over all your communication channels. It’s best to deactivate comments on your Facebook page, pause your company newsletter and instruct everyone answering phones or greeting the public to direct all questions to a member of the crisis communications team. Everyone must be in sync in managing how your organization communicates in the middle of a crisis situation.

Be Consistent in Your Messaging

While it is important to adapt your messaging as facts present themselves, the messaging strategy and tone you and your crisis communications team agree to should remain consistent. Shifting the premise of your messaging will only create chaos, creating further confusion and eroding trust in your organization’s ability to manage the situation. There is also a tendency by some to question the strategy if an immediate resolution does not manifest. Recognize that once in a crisis, there are no quick fixes but often rather only a series of unpleasant realities. Managing a crisis in progress is about being patient and, frequently, picking the least damaging option available among several less-than-ideal options.

Do Not Lie

A final point on messaging: don’t lie. Don’t guess and don’t try to obfuscate. As noted in step one, your messaging must be fact-based. You should never try to spin your way out of a crisis as doing so almost always leads to making matters worse. Be honest, even when painful. And while legally you may be advised to not admit guilt, there are ways your legal and communications team can work together to provide fact-based and forthright messaging that will ultimately move you toward a more positive outcome in crisis situations.

Applying the above steps can help your team better manage a crisis and help ensure you aren’t completely overwhelmed by circumstances, some of which may not be of your organization’s making or in its control. But when in doubt, contact a professional crisis communications team. Your reputation and bottom line are worth the investment.

The Untold Story of InsurTech Insights USA 2023

Posted on by
Reply

When I first made the transition from being a journalist to working in the world of public relations, a mentor gave me the following tip: When you get a reporter on the phone, you only have about 10 seconds to prove you have a story worth their interest. If you can’t wow them in the first 10 seconds, you’ve lost them.

I was reminded of this lesson at the 2023 InsurTech Insights USA conference in New York City in June. There I participated in the conference’s speed-dating-style networking structure. It afforded me the chance to meet with nearly 30 different companies in less than two days.

What became apparent in those rapid-fire meet-and-greet meetings – and was noted by several of those with whom I met – was that many of them struggled with their elevator pitch.

These were brilliant minds: data scientists, computer programmers, academics, serial entrepreneurs and financial geniuses. Their struggle was in capturing the attention of their listeners in the first moments of meeting. This wasn’t just my observation; several told me this was the biggest challenge they faced as they took their start-up or early-stage companies to market. Given the highly technical nature of many of their insurtech models, clearly and succinctly connecting what they did with a business case for their prospect proved challenging. In fact, it was one of the major reasons some wanted to talk to me. They wanted assistance in getting their message out to stakeholders.

What I shared was another lesson I learned long ago as a young reporter: people care about stories they can relate to or in which they see something that reminds them of themselves. Yes, business professionals want to know how a particular product or service improves their bottom line. But before you can get to the features and benefits, you must be able to tell a story that will capture their attention. That’s the secret to a great elevator pitch, winning over the prospect in a sales meeting or capturing the imagination and interest of a reporter.

If you can develop a great story that has a dynamic and recognizable opening, based on use or case studies or even your business’s origin story, and give it a strong opening that will grab the listener, you’ve won their attention. And with that attention, you can present your product or service to a more receptive and engaged audience. That is how you effectively communicate value.

Many businesses, well established or otherwise, share this same struggle. Engineers, financiers, technologists and entrepreneurs rarely study communications in school or launch their professional careers focused on telling great stories. They focused on their expertise and problems to be solved. Having a talented communications team behind them can improve an organization’s ability to better connect the problem to be solved with a helpful product or service. That is the X-factor in countless success stories waiting to be told.

Maximize Your Conference ROI

Posted on by
Reply

You’ve registered for the conference and booked your hotel. Your flight is booked. Maybe you reviewed the attendee lists and identified your prospects. Perhaps you even reached out and scheduled some business development meetings before departing for the conference. Bully for you. That is a successful return on your organization’s investment. Or is it?

You see, most people fail to take full advantage of their conference attendance. Sure, the above looks great. But if those business development meetings fail you will end up with an expensive boondoggle on your hands.

Conferences are about more than landing a single business meeting or networking at the event. Conferences are about seeing and being seen — at and beyond the event.

Below are three considerations you should factor into gauging the return on your conference attendance investment:

  1. Live Social Media Posts. Social media posting at conferences helps to get you noticed — by attending journalists, by business prospects and sometimes even potential employers. If you want to be seen as someone with their finger on the pulse of industry trends and developments — as someone who can solve problems and leverage opportunities — posting to social media during conferences helps. This includes using the dreaded-but-necessary selfie and use of appropriate industry and conference hashtags.
    1. Ideas for posts include: a picture of and quote from a speaker on the stage, a 15-second video of you talking about a highlight of the conference, promoting an upcoming presentation with a sentence about why you think it’s important, a photo of yourself with one of the speakers afterward noting something of import they focused on or said, etc.
  2. Blogs & LinkedIn Articles. A thoughtful and succinct article for your company blog or LinkedIn page about the conference allows you to highlight event content while also shining a light on your expertise, perspective and sometimes even leadership on a topic. With correct tagging and backlinks, you can also use the marketing power of the conference’s coattails to drive your message. Next day is preferable; within a week is the limit for posting content after the conference.
  3. Media Interviews. Bigger conferences typically have media in attendance. This can be one of the most productive uses of your time. If you have a perspective or opinion that fits within the theme or topic of the conference, get yourself interviewed. At a minimum, set up a 15-minute meet-and-greet with attending journalists to tell them a little about your organization (3 minutes or less) and what you can offer in terms of insights and opinions as a potential source. Work with your in-house communications team or external public relations agency to do what they do best: putting you together with media and get you prepped for those interviews or background conversations.

While the above may seem extra, the results of leveraging them appropriately can be extraordinary in marketing yourself and your organization. All have post-event marketing uses and can be used several times over, post-conference, to demonstrate your industry leadership … as well as maximizing your organization’s conference budget investments.

When Conferences Go Wrong: Have a Plan

Posted on by
Reply

Some conferences go smoothly. Others end in the wake of an active shooter event. There is a lot of grey between those two extremes, and organizations sending personnel to conferences ought to have a communications plan in place for the unexpected.

Last month, my colleague Eileen Coyne and I were attending RISKWorld in Atlanta (April 30 to May 3). On the final day of the conference, ahead of the closing keynote, an active shooter event took place a few miles from the conference location.

Our first notification of trouble came in the form of an ABC News alert. Text alerts from our hotel and the convention followed. Digital signage at the conference turned green with white text, alerting everyone to shelter in place and that the conference center was not part of the active shooter scene.

We immediately reached out to our families as well as colleagues to advise them that we were fine, that the conference was shutting down and the event in question was not nearby. As it turned out, the shooting took place two blocks from our hotel. It would be hours before the hotel would come out of lockdown and allow guests to come and go.

In speaking with other attendees, it became clear that if their companies had formal crisis communications plans at all (and about half of most US organizations do not), they did not have protocols for staff attending off-site events during an emergency.

Given the current social climate, all organizations need to develop crisis protocols for off-site events. Contacting the staff attending the event, confirming they are safe and cascading that message across the organization – and potentially to the family of those staffers involved — should be part of any crisis communications strategy. This applies whether it’s your CEO speaking at the conference as well as employee attendees or sales team members staffing the company’s vendor booth.

Whether the crisis originates from the actions of a person or persons, Mother Nature or something else, having a plan for out-of-town staffers in case of emergency is key. And, importantly, those traveling should be trained in the details of the plan — including phone contacts and protocols if cell or other communication services are disrupted.

According to the FBI, active shooter deaths and injuries are at a 5-year high this year. Companies with traveling personnel who spend any significant time on the road should receive active shooter training. This includes the basic principles of run, hide and fight, as well as what to do when and if authorities arrive on scene if you are present during an active shooter event.

This may all appear extreme. And it may be, until your organization is receiving urgent calls from worried families, coworkers or clients in the middle of a crisis event. Being able to respond quickly, with a protocol to follow and facts in hand can help keep your team safe during a chaotic and worrying situation and allow you to communicate factually with all parties concerned.

Crisis of Confidence

Posted on by
Reply

In the span of just three months – one at the end of 2022 and two at the beginning of 2023 – the insurance industry has been at the center of significant crises situations that have played out in the media. While the scenarios cover a broad spectrum of what could go wrong, from each situation emanates one key theme – the value in planning ahead for a potential crisis.

In December, State Farm was the focus of an investigative feature story detailing allegations that the insurer discriminates against black homeowners in claims scenarios. With a human, empathetic approach to its response, State Farm struck exactly the right tone in a situation where the story would have proceeded with or without the company’s input. The response, shrouded in what appears to be sincere embarrassment, may ultimately serve State Farm well if the company continues to resolve the matter while owning any mistakes made.

The Norfolk Southern train derailment on Feb. 3, 2023 and the resulting chemical spill dominated most headlines and broadcast news coverage for most of February. As investigations proceed and claims likely exceed Norfolk Southern’s liability coverage, increased scrutiny will fall on railroad insurance generally and risk management practices in the transportation industry more specifically. In time, insurers will face questions about how the U.S. transports sensitive cargo and the safety measures it mandates of its insureds.

And finally, in late February, North Carolina investment firm founder Greg E. Lindberg again generated headlines when he was charged by a federal grand jury in a $2 billion fraud scheme. According to the indictment, Lindberg and others are accused of improperly taking money for personal use from insurance companies controlled by Lindberg. This news follows a 2020 bribery conviction of Lindberg that was overturned on appeal in 2022. Lindberg has since made several combative statements, issued a press release announcing planned actions by his defense team, and otherwise taken actions to ensure his name remains in the headlines, come what may.

And these are just a few of the more recent, audacious headline makers.

As has been said many times before, the insurance industry has a communications problem. And like so many other industries, the crisis communications capabilities of the insurance industry are lacking.

Countless businesses of all sizes are ill-prepared for crisis situations where they must communicate with multiple stakeholders: investors, board members, employees, vendors, the public at large, industry leaders, etc. Most lack a Crisis Communications Plan. And for those who might have a crisis plan of a sort, those plans are often out of date by many years and/or have never been stress tested. In fact, if you quizzed most senior executives at any number of organizations, they would be hard pressed to verify a Crisis Communications Plan exists for their company, and who is assigned to what roles on the designated crisis team.

Crisis Communications Plans give companies and non-profits a road map to follow, designate team members with clearly defined roles, and provide approved language for a range of scenarios that allow for the type of rapid response required in the current media environment. These plans also empower crisis team members with both formal training that helps them to avoid missteps and with the authority to act in the best interests of the organization within certain parameters. Lacking such a plan, most companies find themselves making it up as they go, which is akin to trying to close the barn doors while the horses are mid-stampede from that same barn. The best you can hope for in that scenario is not to be crushed in the experience.

Like insurance itself, a good Crisis Communications Plan is a hedge against disaster. While it will require an initial investment, the savings such plans provide can be incalculable in a true emergency situation. Some crises result in bet-the-business risks that often can only be resolved if the actions taken are deftly communicated. One need only look at recent bank failures – driven by crises of confidence primarily – to understand how vital quick, thoughtful and fact-driven communication can be in the life of any organization.

Why Lack of a Crisis Communications Plan Should Terrify You

Posted on by
Reply

Crises come in many forms.

They could present as one (or more) negative online reviews of your business. Others manifest through the court system in the guise of lawsuits or other law enforcement actions involving executives, employees or clients/customers. Customer complaints, employee disputes or soured relations with the local community or other stakeholders can constitute critical crises situations. Still others might involve negative press coverage or complaints on social media. The worst crises involve issues of life and death.

In Crisis, You’re Surrounded. Sometimes Literally.

Try to imagine having your workplace or for senior leadership, your home, surrounded by numerous news vans for hours or even days; harassing your workers, customers, and neighbors relentlessly to secure comments about whatever negative issue has befallen your organization. Now try to imagine keeping to a business-as-usual schedule as the world puts you under an intense microscope.

You don’t have to be a crisis expert to recognize when your organization is mired in one. In 1964, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart described how he determined if something was obscene by famously saying, “I know it when I see it.” The same standard applies for leaders in determining if a crisis exists and how seriously it threatens the organization.

In more than 15 years of crisis communications management, I’ve seen all the above scenarios and quite a few more. Most of the organizations involved were wholly unprepared and found themselves, at best, struggling to manage.

Yes, they had lawyers. In nearly every case, the lawyers were excellent. But lawyers concern themselves with minimizing liability; their concern is rarely public opinion. And public opinion, frankly, will make or break a business’s bottom line or crush a non-profit’s fundraising capabilities, not to mention create reputational damage that can linger for years.

The Scariest Role Playing Ever

I like to pose the following to senior leaders, and while some may find these scenarios alarmist or extreme, they happened. My colleagues and I have managed them. Nearly every case was a bet-the-business situation and in each, the client lacked a crisis plan. This meant the best that could be done was to try to get their version of events out in front.

Imagine getting a text message or email that briefly outlines one of the following scenarios:

  • Your CFO has been arrested, is in custody and there will be a mug shot and perp walk in front of waiting press outside the police or district attorney’s office within the hour.
  • One of your workers has been killed on the job, either in a work-related accident or active shooter incident, and numerous local and national media are asking for a statement immediately.
  • Your CEO has been unexpectedly terminated or has died. The press are seeking an interview with whomever will take over, and the board of directors has called an emergency meeting expecting you to lay out how you will manage this situation.
  • Protesters have surrounded your business with signs and megaphones that are paralyzing your operations and drawing the attention of media regarding alleged poor worker conditions, or health code violations or claims that non-union labor was employed in a recent or ongoing renovation.
  • One of your leading donors has been arrested on charges of financial fraud and the media are reaching out asking if you will return the substantial funds provided to help compensate the donor’s alleged victims.
  • You have been accused of sexual harassment, law enforcement are at your door or on their way to interview you and the press have learned of this and are surrounding your workplace or home right now.

If you were involved in any of the above scenarios and you looked out your window, you would likely see a parade of news vans pulling up while your cell phone and email exploded with all manner of stakeholders asking questions. What would you do in the first 5 minutes? The first 10 minutes? The first hour? Most importantly, what would your plan be to manage the situation?

Calling the lawyers is a given, but they won’t manage the press.

Dozens of Questions at Once

What’s the process one follows to draft a statement the lawyers can live with that will also help the organization to try to stop the bleeding? Who will write that statement? How will they vet it? Does someone from the organization read the statement to the press? Is it emailed? What if the press keep asking questions? Do you do an interview, and if so, with which outlet? What are the pros and cons of doing an interview? Is the person to be interviewed media trained? Who is in charge of ongoing messaging? Who has to sign off on the messaging?

So many questions will emerge. Unfortunately, answers will be needed for most of those questions within the first hour or two. Otherwise, the situation can easily devolve to the point where it becomes nearly impossible to manage all the moving pieces.

Now, is every situation so extreme? No. A few bad reviews of your restaurant won’t prompt a media blitz. But, you’d better have a timely plan to message to your existing and prospective customers before reservations start canceling. However, every crisis scenario — from minor to major — requires timely communications, and that’s a challenge at best when there’s no plan and each passing hour might be damaging the organization.

If what I’ve shared raised an eyebrow or you actually tried to answer some of the above and struggled to clearly answer my questions even a little, then you are not prepared for a crisis. And you absolutely need to be.

Start By Asking for Help

Crisis communications planning, like life insurance, is something no one really wants to use. But to protect the people and things you care about you need both.

If you’re curious about what you might need in a crisis communications plan or what the process might look like for your organization to create one, get in touch with me.

Our agency offers free crisis communications planning consultation — which, of course, is different from crisis communications management. We do that too.  But if you’re planning for 2023 and beyond for your organization, consider putting the development of a crisis communications plan at the top of your priority list. Because when a crisis comes, and one will, not only will you know it when you see it, you’ll wish you had a robust and tested plan to address it.