In the world of consumables, consumers experience a brand with all five senses. The look and feel of a product, what the package sounds like when opening it, how it smells and of course, how it tastes. In short, when a consumable product changes, people tend to notice. 

In the case of any product or brand, consumers and their appetites shift, markets transform and costs rise, making change inevitable. But it is not necessarily the change that can be a risk to brands, it is how they communicate that change to their stakeholders. Failing to thoughtfully and proactively message around a product in the face of change can leave even the most loyal consumers questioning their brand allegiance. 

The Reese’s Family Legacy 

The Hershey Company experienced this firsthand just a few months ago when one of their legacy brands, Reese’s Peanut Butter Cups, came under fire by the original creator’s grandson.  

In February, Brad Reese took to LinkedIn in an open letter to Todd Scott of The Hershey Company. In his letter, he alleged the “Reese’s identity is being rewritten,” going on to criticize the company’s decision to replace milk chocolate with more cost-effective compounds and ingredients. The letter gained national media attention, covered by The Associated Press, CBS News, NPR and more. Days later, The Hershey Company opened their doors to a local CBS news station claiming the recipe had not changed, and gave them a tour of the factory in an attempt at transparency. But the tour was not perceived as transparent at all. 

A few weeks later, The Hershey Company made a public announcement that they would return to using “classic milk and dark chocolate recipes” in all its products by 2027, suggesting they did in fact change the recipes. This promise fell flat on Brad Reese, who was quoted in the New York Times saying “if they were serious, they would do it right away.” 

Lessons in Product Messaging 

Though Brad Reese’s viral LinkedIn post and the subsequent national media attention the incident received is an extreme example, the risks that brands take when they are not proactive with communication, in particular in communicating a change, is clear. The very minute Brad Reese posted his letter to LinkedIn, The Hershey Company was forced to react rather than lead the narrative and use the change as an opportunity to build trust with their audiences. A decision that was likely rooted in the rising costs of chocolate was quickly escalated to a conversation on the future of the entire Reese’s brand. Consider the following relevant lessons in product messaging: 

• Be Proactive: Business communications is about more than “sharing the fun” or the positive company announcements with the world. When it comes to product messaging, businesses must think strategically about how a change to a product may be received by its stakeholders. This is where involving a communications professional from the beginning of a process can be helpful. They can carefully and strategically consider various scenarios and possible outcomes. The Hershey Company, for example, likely did not predict that Brad Reese’s LinkedIn post would spiral into a crisis. Having ample time to consider all scenarios and adjust messaging before any changes are made public can help prevent misinterpretation, confusion and subsequent distrust. 
• Be Transparent: Too often when companies are criticized, it comes down to a lack of corporate transparency. In The Hershey Company’s example, quietly changing the product over time then claiming the recipe had remained untouched diminished their credibility when they inevitably had to come clean. Transparently communicating product changes and providing context around its reasoning, especially in cases when changes are received unfavorably, can help reinforce brand loyalty.    
• Be Prepared: The court of public opinion is unpredictable. When changes are made to a product, a proactive and transparent approach can help limit backlash, but it is always a good idea to be prepared for the worst scenario. Having responses and spokespeople ready to provide context and answer questions can help ensure any negative public sentiment is contained, the business can promote an accurate narrative and avoid rash decision-making. Failing to prepare for such scenarios leads to further inconsistencies in media coverage, misinterpretation by stakeholders, and eventual dissolution of trust. 

Brad Reese’s public dissatisfaction with The Hershey Company is a perfect example of how a single voice can turn the public’s perception upside down overnight. Communicators must be alert to change and consider how that change is not only shared with the public, but how the public may respond. By being proactive, transparent and prepared for all scenarios, businesses can avoid unnecessary crises, while maintaining loyalty and trust among their stakeholders.