Your AI content isn’t yours, and people are noticing.

For some, the advent of ChatGPT has democratized public relations, marketing, graphic design and countless other creative fields, empowering just about anyone to create whatever content they want anytime, anywhere. And, yes, people are noticing—but their reaction might not be positive.

In the case of public relations, some unwanted or unintended recognition is happening among journalists who are filtering for and flagging AI-generated email pitches and/or contributed content.

This can lead to a simple admonishment if the AI content runs up against an outlet’s AI policy. Alternatively, the impact can be more extreme, leading to an outright ban of the offending organization and/or the public relations pros connected to the infraction. It comes down to the outlet’s AI policy, a nascent but growing best practices area for media outlets. Some I’ve spoken to have told me if contributed content is deemed to be 30% or more AI generated, they will return it for re-writing. Others, at their discretion, say they reject outright any content deemed to be written—in whole or part—by AI. By the way, it’s not all about my beloved em dashes anymore.

As for email pitches, what’s clear is some reporters are turning this shiny tech resource against itself.

To be sure, journalists have always applied filters to their email inboxes. Some journalists use built-in tools to file or discard certain messages, keywords or even the emails of ne’er-do-well publicists and public relations people who have run afoul of basic rules of the road.

However, with AI—ironically—journalists are now leveraging their own artificial intelligence tools and resources to identify AI vagary (a tell-tale indicator of either AI or ill-informed public relations people), relevance to their beats or interests, lack of clear opinion, perspective or concrete angle and clean, simple writing. Still other journalists are training Google’s Gemini or ChatGPT (used by 77% of journalists according to Muck Rack’s State of Journalism 2025 Report) to look for the superlatives that drive editors out of their logophile minds such as:

• Unique
• Best-in-class
• Unprecedented
• Cutting edge

So why should you care as a non-communications professional leading an organization? For the same reason you deploy public relations in the first place: to protect and enhance your reputation. If the media are filtering you out because AI has become the driver of your public voice, that public voice will be overlooked and ignored in the din of others clamoring for attention.

Here’s what I advise:

1. Understand the AI practices of your public relations team, be they an external agency or an in-house communications department. And if you’re tasking your marketing team with executing your public relations efforts, I respectfully submit you are likely mismanaging your marketing team at best and at worst failing to execute PR properly, which wastes your organization’s money and the time of everyone involved.
2. If you don’t already have an AI policy for content, create one that addresses how and when to employ AI for content and communications purposes, leaning heavily into fact checking as well as using AI to support, not lead, your comms work.
3. Deploying AI in preliminary research and outline generation makes sense, but don’t use it to write. AI content is often obvious to outside observers and it often dilutes your messaging and thinking to a malaise of sameness.
4. Understand the media you’re pitching and what, if any, AI policies they employ before sending them anything remotely connected to AI content.
5. Using AI to improve or better articulate your message is one thing, but asking an algorithm to grab a journalist’s attention without original thinking on your part is the fastest way to prove how you are not a good source of information for serious media doing serious work.
6. Work with PR professionals who understand how journalists work and who follow ethical practices to ensure your reputation is in the best possible hands.

Remember good tech is designed to enhance, streamline and assist while leaving the human aspects of the work—in this case creativity and communications—intact. Used poorly, technology takes over the world, destroys humanity and runs for governor of the Great State of California.